Advocates of person-first language argue that people experiencing homelessness or poverty are people first and should not be defined by their housing or economic circumstances. For example, “unhoused people” or “people experiencing housing insecurity” would be preferable to “the homeless.” As stated earlier, language preference varies and it is always better to ask what the person prefers or if unable to ask, use the preferred language of the community.
Below is a list of topics to keep in mind when researching housing insecurity and poverty within the Research Collection. The list is not a comprehensive exploration of the intersectionality of homelessness, poverty, and marginalization, but are facets of related issues, each with its own complexities. More information about the history of homelessness and the treatment of people experiencing homelessness can be found in the Sources section.
addiction
capitalism
corporate control
criminalizing/decriminalizing
discrimination
disinvested
displacement
economic and social conditions
economic rights
equality/inequality
eviction
exploitation
food insecurity
gentrification
homelessness
housing inequality
immigration
indigent
income distribution
income maintenance programs
LGBTQIA+
mental health
racism
social class
social justice
social rights
social services
squatters
tent cities / tent colony
under-resourced
unhoused
warming/cooling centers
welfare
The terms used to describe people and experiences have changed over time, carry different meanings for different groups of people, and can vary by region of the country or globe. It is important to keep this in mind when evaluating and using resources. There is nuance in the meaning behind the words and how they have been defined. Socially, terms can change quickly and there is variety in the personal preferences for how individuals want to be addressed. The important action is to use language with respect to the individual or community, understanding that all circumstances are multifaceted.
Disclaimer: The material in CHM collections may contain offensive language or negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of the historical record. The Chicago History Museum has an institution-wide initiative to critically consider the language used to describe people and materials, and we invite you to read more about our related projects.
Below is a list of terms that appear within the collection, their situated meaning, and issues with the use of these terms. While many of these terms are no longer used by the Library of Congress as authorized subject headings, it is important to note that they will still appear in the catalog because they are part of resources within the Research Collection, such as appearing in titles of books or the names of organizations. Some of these terms may be outdated, have associations with stigma or stereotypes, or may be harmful in other ways. We are always working toward harm reduction whenever possible, but have highlighted these terms because we feel its important to cull materials that give the broadest possible historical view of the issue. Please proceed with care.
Identity term | Situated Meaning | Issues |
Vagrant |
|
Though perhaps less openly derogatory than other terms, "vagrant" still carries with it a history of legislative criminalization of homelessness and poverty, often implicitly targeting particular racial groups. |
Hobo |
|
When the term is conflated with the “tramps” and “vagrants”, it obscures the nuance of the identity and community of the hobo culture and experiences. The romanticization of the term—in particular its association with a free-spirited, bohemian, countercultural, or intellectual lifestyle—could be problematic in that it obscures the difficult circumstances of those living with homelessness and poverty. |
Bum |
|
This term was and still is pejorative, potentially also implying that a person's economic situation is the result of their own laziness or lack of work ethic, rather than social and institutional marginalization. |
The homeless |
|
Using a general term to group together individuals experiencing housing insecurity removes the nuance of their situations and obscures the societal, economic, and political factors that contribute to the problem of stable housing. Advocates distinguish between a ‘home’ and a ‘house’, and that homes typically refer to the feeling of a space and a sense of belonging. Tent encampments and other groups can provide a sense of belonging, but that is distinct from the stability and security provided by the structure of a house. Hence the use of the term ‘unhoused’ or ‘those experiencing housing insecurities.’ |
Tramp |
|
In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries this term was used derogatorily, and sometimes written or spoken of in terms of a pestilent social nuisance in need of elimination, as in the "tramp problem." At the same time the romanticized nature of the term is problematic in that it obscures the difficult circumstances of those living with homelessness and poverty. |
Poor farm and Poor house ("Poorhouse"; "Workhouse"; "Almshouse"; "Poor asylum") |
|
Along with asylums, poor farms and poor houses were in many respects conceived of as correctional institutions for people living with poverty, disability, and mental illness (often with the implication of institutionalizing them to rid regular society of them). The seemingly neutral nature of the these terms could obscure the abuse suffered by individuals at the hands of these institutions. |
For more information on individual terms, see the Sources section.
The Chicago History Museum relies on subject headings authorized by the Library of Congress to organize its catalog records. This controlled vocabulary facilitates the uniform access and retrieval of items in libraries and archives worldwide. Researchers can search headings in CHM's online catalog ARCHIE by subject keyword.
CHM recognizes the limitations of these and other subject headings, noting that names and terms used may be inadequate or misleading. Furthermore, some headings are predicated on colonialist assumptions that might contradict an individual’s sense of identity and/or a researcher’s intentions. While CHM librarians are working to mitigate harmful language, these Library of Congress subject headings currently provide a way to isolate records within ARCHIE.
Both topical headings and organization names that appear frequently in ARCHIE include:
Note: This list is not comprehensive, but meant instead as a suggested starting point.